2019 16

Рroblems and prospects of Ukraine integration to the European cluster network

Mishura Vitalii B.
Phd in Economics;
Gitis Tetiana P.
Phd in Economics
ORCID
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4992-8438
Donbass state engineering academy, Kramatorsk

Citation Format
Mishura V.B., Gitis T.P. Рroblems and prospects of Ukraine integration to the European cluster network. Management of Economy: Theory and Practice. Chumachenko’s Annalscollection of scientific papers / Institute of Industrial Economics of the NAS of Ukraine. Kyiv, 2019. P. 208-221. https://doi.org/10.37405/2221-1187.2019.208-221

Language
Ukrainian

Resume
The article describes the features of cluster formation in the regions of Ukraine, considered what cluster initiatives were implemented and the reasons from which clusterization did not lead to the desired result. Determination of priority directions of clusterization in many regions of Ukraine does not take into account the peculiarities of industrial development, leaving out the attention of the industry with the greatest potential of clusterization and formed inter-branch cooperative ties. Priority factors contributing to the cluster policy of Ukraine show that the activities of state and local authorities are one of the most influential factors, and it is the most impeding the formation of a cluster policy and impeding its research, analysis and dissemination. The directions of promoting cluster initiatives through the change of the state policy vector in Ukraine are outlined.

Keywords
cluster, clustering, cluster policy, strategy, cluster initiatives.

Referensces

  1. Delgado M., Porter M., Stern S. (2016). Clusters and entrepreneurship. Journal of Economic Geography. Retrieved from http://joeg.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2016/05/28/jeg.lbq010.abstract
  2. Ketels C., Protsiv S. (2014). Clusters and the New Growth Path for Europe, Working Paper. Vienna , WIFO. P. 59–63.
  3. Neffke F., Henning M., Boschma R. (2011). How Do Regions Diversify over Time? Industry Relatedness and the Development of New Growth Paths in Regions. Journal of Economic Geography. 2011, рр. 247–249.
  4. European Cluster Observatory 2016, Cluster programmes in Europe. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/12925
  5. European Commission, EUROPE 2020. A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. (2010). Brussels, EEA. P. 28–31.
  6. Miles R.E., Snow Ch.C. (2012). Causes of Failure in Network Organizations. California Management Review, Vol. 34(4), рр. 53–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/41166703
  7. Sverrisson Á. (2013). Enterprise clusters in developing countries: mechanisms of transition and stagnation. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Vol. 15(3), рр. 183–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620210159239
  8. Summary of the report «Lithuanian Clusterization, (2017). Promotion and development of Innovation Networking – InoLink». Research Institute for Changes (RICh), рр. 32–39.
  9. Strategic Action Process for Competitiveness Cluster Formation – a guidebook for practitioners Retrieved from https://poduzetnistvo.gov.hr/UserDocsImages/EU%20projekti/IPA%20IIIC/Podr%C5%A1ka%20razvoju%20klastera/7.Strate%C5%A1ki%20akcijski%20proces%20o%20osnivanju%20tri%20klastera.pdf
  10. Lindqvist G., Ketels C., Sölvell Ö. (2013). The cluster initiative greenbook 2.0. Stockholm: Ivory Tower Publishers, рр. 8–14.
  11. Bergman E. (2016). Cluster life-cycles: An emerging synthesis. Vienna: Institute for Regional Development and Environment. Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration, рр. 101–105.
  12. Lindqvist G., Sölvell Ö. (2016). Organising clusters for innovation: Lessons from city regions in Europe. CLUSNET Final Report, Clusters and Cities Network. 54–62.
  13. The European Cluster Collaboration Platform. Retrieved from https://www.clustercollaboration.eu
  14. Competitiveness of Enterprises and Small and Medium-sized Enterprises. Retrieved from http://cosme.me.gov.ua/
  15. Tarasenko T. V. (2004). Mekhanizm venchurnogo finansirovaniya innovatsionnogo predprinimatel’stva [The mechanism of venture financing of innovative entrepreneurship]. Biznes Inform Business Inform, 5–6, рр. 49–51 [in Russian].
  16. Matiienko V.M. (2008). Venchurne finansuvannia innovatsiinoi diialnosti pidpryiemstv [Venture financing of innovative activity of enterprises]. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Donbasu – Economic Herald of the Donbas, 1(11), рр. 156-158 [in Ukrainian].
  17. Poruchnyk A.M., Antoniuk L.L. (2000). Venchurnyi kapital: zarubizhnyi dosvid ta problemy stanovlennia v Ukraini [Venture capital: foreign experience and problems of formation in Ukraine]. Kyiv, KNEU [in Ukrainian].
  18. 2016 European Venture Capital Report. (2017). Retrieved from https://blog.dealroom.co/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/2016-European-Venture-Capital-Report.pdf
  19. Butenko A.I., Umanets T.V., Hrynevych L.V. (2017). Metodolohichni osnovy doslidzhennia innovatsiinoho potentsialu tekhnolohichnoho pidpryiemnytstva v Ukraini [Methodological bases of research of innovative potential of technological entrepreneurship in Ukraine]. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Donbasu – Economic Herald of the Donbas, 2 (48), рр. 177-186 [in Ukrainian].
  20. Heiets V.M., Fedulovа L.I. (Eds.). (2007). Natsionalna innovatsiina systema: zarubizhnyi dosvid, stan v Ukraini. Analitychni materialy do parlamentskykh slukhan [National innovation system: foreign experience, the situation in Ukraine. Analytical materials for parliamentary hearings]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
  21. Nikiforov P.O., Hladchuk O.M. Problemy rozvytku venchurnoho kapitalu v Ukraini ta sviti [Problems of venture capital development in Ukraine and the world]. Retrieved from http://www.nbuv.gov.ua [in Ukrainian].

Full Text .pdf